Roman
History/Life
Individual
Project Rubric
Latin
I
Name:
Date:
Project:
Due Date:
Monday, October 23,
2006
Comments:
FINAL
GRADE:
Late
Deduction (-5 per day
late):
25-30%
CRITERION # 1: Reflects New or In Depth Knowledge about Roman History or
Life
70
85
100
l
l
l
little in depth exploration
some in depth knowledge evident
great
deal of in depth topic exploration
little new knowledge evident
some
new knowledge evident
great deal of new knowledge
information entirely from class notes
evident
20-25%
CRITERION # 2: Effective
Oral Presentation to the Class
70
85
100
l
l
l
little eye contact with audience
partial eye
contact with audience
great eye contact with audience
voice difficult to hear or words mumbled
voice occasionally not heard or
voice always heard and understood
words sometimes mumbled
flat delivery style, few gestures/little
adequate delivery style, some gestures/
effective delivery style/ appropriate intonation
voice intonation
gestures/voice intonation
presentation disorganized some of presentation organized entire presentation well
organized
many
pauses; ill prepared
some pauses & disorganization
no pauses; well organized
10-30% CRITERION # 3:
Effective Visual Aid
70
85
100
l
l
l
visible to few
visible
to most in audience
visible to all in audience
overly simplistic design
adequate design
complex design
messy appearance
somewhat/partially neat appearance
very neat appearance
poorly designed/constructed
adequately
designed/constructed
well designed/well constructed
For Costume, (graded ONLY if this
was your only visual aid)
sheet from the Latin room material with holes cut out for neck and arms toga/tunic made/sewn by student
no detail in design nice costume but borrowed from another source elaborate design detail
some
design detail
0-25% CRITERION
#4:
Effectively expressed and well
organized written
presentation
(Used only for written projects, e.g. a
pamphlet)
70
85
100
l
l
l
illogical order
adequately organized
well organized
lacks development of info/
ideas
some development of info/ ideas
information/ideas well developed
topic research limited
adequate research evident
in
depth research evident
10-15%
CRITERION # 5: Unique or Creative Approach
70
85
100
l
l
l
little evidence of clever interpretation some evidence of clever interpretation much evidence of clever
interpretation
lacks originality
some originality
very original
throughout
|
|